[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.
- From: John Galt <galt(at)inconnu.isu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 04:10:54 -0600 (MDT)
- In-Reply-To: <3BCCD3D9.1050107@eurorights.org>
- Mail-Followup-To: galt@inconnu.isu.edu
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Lars Gaarden wrote:
>
>Let me put on my devil's advocate hat for a moment..
>
>They are talking about preventing copyright infringement in the
>context of wire or electronic communication. That is, jamming
>Napster or perhaps exploit a weakness in the election protocol
>for supernodes in the Kazaa network in order to force the
>supernodes to be run on RIAA-controlled machines.
>
>We're talking interference, jamming, chaffing. Not breaking and
>entering into my and your computer.
They call that DoS, make more than one machine interfere, they call it
DDoS, and they jail individuals for it.
>
--
There is no problem so great that it cannot be solved with suitable
application of High Explosives.
Who is John Galt? galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who!