[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.
- From: "John Zulauf" <johnzu(at)ia.nsc.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 09:25:09 -0600
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0110171053190.15961-100000@sparcy.internal.lan>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Noah silva wrote:
>
> > rip, it takes X minutes of computer time, Y minutes of my time -- that's
> > a real historical cost basis. If someone accidentally leaves open the
> > file sharing port on Win9X (that is the default), or mistakenly shares
> > (through honest user error) their MP3 folder and the RIAA hacks in a
> > deletes them, $5K should add up fast.
>
> Yes, but, if having a public web site is giving permission for users to
> access it, then having an open drive share with public write permission
> seems to me to be giving permission for peeople to
> read/write/delete. (even if it is due to user ignorence). I can't call
> accessing an open share "hacking".
If I forgot to lock my door isn't it still illegal to walk-in and
vandalize my house. Accessing a share... probably not illegal. Deleting
my MP3... definitely so.
John (who wishes his computer was fast enough to rip MP3 at greater than
2x) Zulauf