[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Fwd: Bush taps Clarke as CyberdefenseChief
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Fwd: Bush taps Clarke as CyberdefenseChief
- From: Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:54:05 -0700
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Steve Gibson has some interesting comments on raw sockets in WindowsXP on
this website (www.grc.com). Given some of his recent experiences with DOS
attacks, I can understand his concerns. There certainly is the potential
for widespread misuse given the expected distribution of WindowsXP. OTOH,
I'm getting pretty tired of hearing about nimda, code red1, code red2, etc
by the talking heads on the tube and NOT hearing them say "OK the internet
is down today thanks to another "feature" created by microsoft" Everybody
keeps reporting on the evil wicked hackers without focusing on the real
culprit-microsoft.
Right now everybody is playing catchup and want to be a computer whizz
just as people did with stereos, cars, and radio decades ago.
Noah silva <nsilva@atari-source.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
10/16/01 07:08 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
cc:
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Fwd: Bush taps Clarke as CyberdefenseChief
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org wrote:
> As with Raw sockets support, ,maybe the best thing to educate people
about
> the dangers is simply to let them see what happens when you allow a
> monopoly to exist....what's more an incompetent one.
BTW I don't get the big deal with Raw socket support. In my view, that's
something GOOD added to windows, albiet something most consumers won't
use. Most OSs, including unix type OSs have had Raw socket support for a
long time.
-- noah silva