[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Hackers = terrorists, an analysis
- To: Scott A Crosby <crosby(at)qwes.math.cmu.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Hackers = terrorists, an analysis
- From: Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 08:35:56 -0700
- Cc: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu, Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
It could be a case of what Arthur C. Clark said years ago- the more
advanced technology becomes the more it appears to be magic to the less
advanced.
Scott A Crosby <crosby@qwes.math.cmu.edu>
09/26/01 05:20 PM
To: <Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org>
cc: <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Hackers = terrorists, an analysis
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001 Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org wrote:
> BTW- Does anybody have any idea what Ashcroft, Feinstein etc THINK a
> "backdoor" is? Technically? How they think it operates? They keep
calling
> for them but I really wonder what they really think they are.
>
They don't know what it is, but they know where to get it: the magic genie
of technology.
After all, technology made encryption, it can make a way to guarentee the
uselessness of encryption..
Hmmm. The first obvious counterexample is nuclear weapons.
--
But, technically, there can be no backdoor without greatly weakening the
system, and subjecting it to myriad new attacks.
Scott