[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[dvd-discuss] The Checks and Ballances are in the mail
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: [dvd-discuss] The Checks and Ballances are in the mail
- From: Jim Bauer <jfbauer(at)home.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:35:29 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <OF40AD7AAF.14340B66-ON88256ACE.0062A47D@aero.org>
- Newsgroups: local.dvd-discuss
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org wrote:
>The courts have many times declared policy set by Congress as
>unconstitutional and often set aside much of the implementation of various
>policies because they violate the intent of policies. Look at
>environmental cases these days. Look at some of the land use cases.
>Congress cannot just vote something without ultimate review as you appear
>to be claiming. THere are checks and balances. Judicial review is one.
It is a flawed checks and ballances. Once a law passes that is one
day declared unconstitutional, the dammage has already begun. It will
often take years or decades to undo the direct dammage. But the
indirect dammage will last forever. It will cost millions of dollars
and greatly affect, if not destroy, the lives of many innocent people.
--
Jim Bauer, jfbauer@home.com