[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] ClearChannel Plays It Safe
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] ClearChannel Plays It Safe
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 17:32:26 -0700
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy A Erwin [mailto:jerwin@gmu.edu]
...
>
> If Clear Channel has enough market penetration to ensure that
> a piece of
> music gets no airplay within a geographic area, it is censorship. The
> fact that CC is not a elected government makes little difference.
>
Now there I agree with you. But I thought there were regulations
to prevent effective monopoly w/in a given market. If not, there
is one place I would support additional legislation/regulation.
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!