[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,28875 ,00.html
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,28875 ,00.html
- From: Andrea.Foster(at)chronicle.com
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:38:27 -0400
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Richard:
I believe Pouliot is talking about a Copyright Office report, which the
Chronicle of HIgher Education wrote about.
See URL below. It also has link to actual report.
http://chronicle.com/free/2001/08/2001083101t.htm
Andrea
Richard Hartman <hartman@onetouch.com>@eon.law.harvard.edu on 09/05/2001
12:15:14 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
To: "'dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
cc:
Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,28875
,00.html
This little gem appears near the end of the article:
<blockquote>
The DMCA "really has helped support the explosion of online content" and
has
had little if any adverse affects, Pouliot said, pointing to a ruling
handed
down by the U.S. Copyright Office last week that said largely the same
thing. </blockquote>
Does anybody know which ruling he is talking about?
"little if any advers affects" they say? I guess
a little chill in the air is not adverse ...
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Steinberg [mailto:synthesis@videotron.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:10 AM
> To: DVD- DISCUSS
> Subject: [dvd-discuss]
> http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,28875,00.html
>
>
> everybody already see this?
>
> --
> Dan Steinberg
>
> SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
> 35, du Ravin phone: (613) 794-5356
> Chelsea, Quebec fax: (819) 827-4398
> J9B 1N1 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca
>
>
- Prev by Date:
Re: [dvd-discuss] http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,28875,00.html
- Next by Date:
RE: [dvd-discuss] http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,28875 ,00.html
- Previous by thread:
[dvd-discuss] http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,28875,00.html
- Next by thread:
Re: [dvd-discuss] http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,28875 ,00.html
- Index(es):