[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Civil Disobedience and the DMCA
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Civil Disobedience and the DMCA
- From: Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 08:41:12 -0700
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Careful....it's very reluctant to put 10,000 people behind bars at once or
provide trials for each of them. Take a look at the Los Angeles Court
system after the LA riots. They had thousands of people that they had to
deal with and it overwhelmed them to the point that the California
legislature had to provide a temporary emergency extension of the times
for arraignment
Tom <tom@lemuria.org>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
09/02/01 02:33 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
cc:
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Civil Disobedience and the DMCA
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 11:01:27AM -0700, Larry Blunk wrote:
> In the case of civil infractions of the DMCA, the plaintiffs
> are able to pick and choose who they go after. Does the government
have
> such leeway in the case of criminal infractions? Would their be any
legal
> precendents set if the government simply chose to ignore such actions?
but where do you find the 10,000 people willing to take the risk of 5
years in the slammer? we know the USSA isn't afraid to put significant
amounts of its population behind bars.
--
-- http://web.lemuria.org
--