[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Dmitry Indictment Doc
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Dmitry Indictment Doc
- From: "James S. Tyre" <jstyre(at)jstyre.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:43:47 -0700
- In-Reply-To: <3B8D166D.85B5A4A2@ia.nsc.com>
- References: <3B8CBF73.2040106@eurorights.org><Pine.LNX.4.33.0108290536440.18724-100000@qwe3.math.cmu.edu><3B8CBF73.2040106@eurorights.org><200108291313.JAA03480@smtp6.mindspring.com>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
At 10:21 AM 8/29/2001 -0600, John Zulauf wrote:
>Does it occur to anyone that the grand jury is doing very sloppy rubber
>stamping of the FBI's claims? The fact that most members of a grand
>jury are older probably means that for those of us in technology fields,
>the grand jury is neither made up of our peers, nor is it populated by
>any that would have the vaugest notion of the facts and issues involved.
>
>Almost like having the Amish run traffic court...
An old saying is that a good prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich. Grand
jury proceedings are, by design, highly one-sided.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
James S. Tyre mailto:jstyre@jstyre.com
Law Offices of James S. Tyre 310-839-4114/310-839-4602(fax)
10736 Jefferson Blvd., #512 Culver City, CA 90230-4969
Co-founder, The Censorware Project http://censorware.net