https://cyber.harvard.edu/anopseudonymity/history/Wendy_on_Corporate_Tone?feed=atomWendy on Corporate Tone - Revision history2026-04-12T22:50:15ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.43.6https://cyber.harvard.edu/anopseudonymity/?title=Wendy_on_Corporate_Tone&diff=1390&oldid=prev140.247.250.74 at 23:55, 19 March 20072007-03-19T23:55:10Z<p></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>I may be misreading, but I'm having difficulty reconciling this <br />
document with the work I'm interested in. This proposal feels very <br />
corporate. That may be because its aim is to secure funding, but if <br />
it will then be a constraint on the work that can be produced in <br />
conjunction with the funding, it's still a problem. Likewise, while <br />
I know we represent differing viewpoints on the role and importance <br />
of anonymity, this document appears to presuppose compromise on many <br />
of those positions. It might be that the result is a set of well <br />
articulated incompatible positions, from which implementers will have <br />
to make an explicit choice of which values to support.<br />
<br />
Am I misreading the function or intent of the document? Then I'll be <br />
able to offer more concrete suggestions.</div>140.247.250.74