Diagnostic Kits/Bibliography by Research Question: Difference between revisions

From Commons Based Research
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 40: Line 40:


= Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector =
= Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector =
* Holman, Christopher M., The Impact of Human Gene Patents on Innovation and Access: A Survey of Human Gene Patent Litigation. UMKC Law Review, Vol. 76, p. 295, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1090562
* Holman, Christopher. 2008 (Nov 4). "Applying Bilski to Biotechnology and the Life Sciences." ''Patently-O.'' http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/11/applying-bilski.html.
* Howlett, M.J. & Christie, A.F., An Analysis of the Approach of the European, Japanese and United States Patent Offices to Patenting Partial DNA Sequences (ESTs). SSRN eLibrary. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=573184 [Accessed October 30, 2009].
* Mueller, J.M., Public Access Versus Proprietary Rights in Genomic Information: What Is the Proper Role of Intellectual Property Rights? SSRN eLibrary. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1367849 [Accessed October 30, 2009].
* Noonan, Kevin.  2009 (Feb 5). "Applying In re Bilski to Diagnostic Method Claims." ''Patent Docs''.  http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/02/applying-in-re-bilski-to-diagnostic-method-claims.html
* Pressman, L. et al., 2006. ''The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey''. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39
**[[Diagnostic_Kits/The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions|Highlights]]
* [http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1403.pdf Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services]. 2009 WL 2950232 C.A.Fed. (Cal.,2009).


= Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits =
= Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits =

Revision as of 17:02, 17 April 2010

Bibliographic entries used in each research question (1-12; defined by the Field Research Methodology).

Overview of Economics of Intellectual Property in Kits

  • Jensen, K. & Murray, F., 2005. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: Enhanced: Intellectual Property Landscape of the Human Genome. Science, 310(5746), 239-240.
  • Mills, A.E. & Tereskerz, P., 2008. DNA-based patents: an empirical analysis. Nat Biotech, 26(9), 993-995.
  • Pressman, L. et al., 2006. The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39

Give an overall picture of the Kits' sector

Outputs and Products of the field: data, narratives and tools produced by the Kits' sector

  • Holman, Christopher M., The Impact of Human Gene Patents on Innovation and Access: A Survey of Human Gene Patent Litigation. UMKC Law Review, Vol. 76, p. 295, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1090562
  • Pressman, L. et al., 2006. The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey. Nat Biotech, 24(1), 31-39

Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of Kits' sector: IP in Kits

Competitive advantages in Kits

IP Profile of Biggest for-profit companies in Kits

IP Profile of non-profit companies in Kits

IP Profile of Universities working in Kits

IP Profile of Associations in Kits

Commons based cases in Kits

Peer-Production Business models in Kits

Open Business models in Kits

  • add entries here