[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Comments from the Judge in the 321 studios case
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Kurt Hockenbury wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 email@example.com wrote:
>> And as I've argued before, works that are distributed with encryption should
>> not be copyrighted
>Ok, so we offer two editions: the encrypted edition, for $9.99, and the
>uncrypted edition, for $999. If you copy the (uncopyrightable) encrypted
>edition, you infringe the encrypted edition.
two threads imply themselves...
1) no, you cannot possibly infringe the unencrypted version, since the
copy [of the encrypted version] is not of the unencrypted version. The
encrypted version is a separate work and copies of it are not copies of
2) yeah, that's the whole point: the unencrypted version is publically
available: they cannot sell only the encrypted version. Nobody ever said
that the unencrypted version would be easily gotten, just that you CAN get
it. If it's worth $1000 to have a legally copyable version to you, by all
means, go for it.
>Or are you saying publishing a work with encryption removes an item from
The Internet must be a medium for it is neither Rare nor Well done!
<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">John Galt </a>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----