[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] 1201 reply comments
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] 1201 reply comments
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 18:51:47 -0800
- In-reply-to: <3E31F3F9.33D8AB8C@swbell.net>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
One thing to note is that the Librarian really wants "factual incidences" not
speculation. I am working on adding some more arguments and factual incidences
to a couple of the comments. If you know of any supporting facts, incidences,
then by all means submit them. All you have to write is "I read comment #N and
remember I had this problem....supply details and references...."
On many of the copy protection comments, if you have first hand knowledge and
experinece with the problems then submit it. If nothing else, the experiences
go into the public record so when the problems begin to snowball as we know
they will they can't say "OH...no one told us"
REmember "to be forwarned is to have four arms" - K. Bundy.
On 24 Jan 2003 at 20:18, Jolley wrote:
Date sent: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 20:18:34 -0600
From: Jolley <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: [dvd-discuss] 1201 reply comments
To: dvd-discuss <email@example.com>
Organization: Southwestern Bell Internet Services
Send reply to: firstname.lastname@example.org
> In case some have forgotten, the copyright office, in their rulemaking
> proceeding mandated by the DMCA, is accepting reply comments until
> February 19th.