If Lexmark is selling the printers at near cost or below with this "feature" to exclude the third party suppliers, does that constitute a tying arrangement for anti-trust? New approach to an old idea.
Jeremy Erwin <jerwin@ponymail.com> Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
01/13/2003 11:07 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
cc:
Subject: [dvd-discuss] more dmca nonsence- Correction
Earlier I implied that the Lexmark cartridges were inkjet cartridges--
but in fact, they are toner cartridges for a laser printer-- Aside from
making everything a bit more expensive, this doesn't change much of
anything