[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Postage Meters and the "Right to Tinker"
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Postage Meters and the "Right to Tinker"
- From: "Richard Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 16:26:24 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Thread-index: AcK4MOCxXnTK9EsASLaoOu3PI68nrwADbmYA
- Thread-topic: [dvd-discuss] Postage Meters and the "Right to Tinker"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Zulauf [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Michael A Rolenz wrote:
> > the other problem with .002's analogy is "how is TurboTax
> > being defrauded?" They actually are not. They are just not getting
> > revenue (the activation fee) rather than being forced to
> spend it (as
> > in the post office). TurboTax is in the same situation if nobody
> > activates it or if everybody cracks it.
> Not quite true, and not particularly interesting. If noone activates
> their disk, some will still be in the market for tax software
> and might
> (upon further review at an online, or retail store) purchase
> Also impacted are TurboTax's competitors, would get the rest of the
> marketshare. If everyone cracks the product, there will be no one let
> interested in buying tax software and no one is compensated.
> The loss to TurboTax is a real one not imagined.
But it is a loss that _they_ incurred when they
made a gift of that CD to me. I now own it, just
as I own that DVD of "Die Hard" we've been using
as our parallel example.
If it weren't for that 'gift' aspect, then I wouldn't
have any problems w/ the idea that hacking past the
DRM is theft of their product. For example, if I
made a copy of that CD and gave it to you, that would
be theft (although if I gave you the original, it
would merely be a transfer of property...)