[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: O'Connor quoted at USA Today from Eldred oral argument
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: O'Connor quoted at USA Today from Eldred oral argument
- From: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson(at)realmeasures.dyndns.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:39:16 -0400
- Organization: Real Measures
- References: <20021010191031.A24914@sethf.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Okay, thanks. Also look at Peter Junger's tactical
Seth Finkelstein wrote:
> Seth Johnson wrote:
> > Yeah! I really, really want to understand this, and I can't. What
> > is going on here? Are certain advocates really afraid of doing
> > First Amendment arguments? I really don't understand why Lessig
> > didn't make the play.
> I'm not a lawyer, but I think the big problem is that however
> stirring First Amendment arguments may be to us, they haven't done very
> well in the courts recently here. Take a look at the "First Amendment"
> discussion section in http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cc/dcaopinion.html :
DRM is Theft! We are the Stakeholders!
New Yorkers for Fair Use
I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or
distribution of this incidentally recorded communication.
Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but
only so far as such an expectation might hold for usual
practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no
claim of exclusive rights.