[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Key case restores copyright balance
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Key case restores copyright balance
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:18:53 -0700
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Thanks. Went right into the dissent section w/o noticing.
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Ballowe [mailto:hangman@steelballs.org]
...
> >
> > This is the last paragraph before the "Cases cited" section, and I
> > believe that this is the final determination of the court: the
> > artist wins.
> >
> > Am I missing something?
>
> Yes -- about 6 paragraphs before that is the beginning of the
> dissenting
> opinion "Per L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier and LeBel JJ. (dissenting):"
>
> -charlie
>