[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: [free-sklyarov] adobe DMCA letters
- To: dvd-discuss(at)lweb.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: [free-sklyarov] adobe DMCA letters
- From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 19:40:59 +0100
- Cc: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)lweb.law.harvard.edu>, free-sklyarov(at)zork.net
- In-reply-to: <E06ADA0073926048AD304115DD8AB6BC9D6909@mail.onetouch.com>; from hartman@onetouch.com on Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:02:11AM -0800
- References: <E06ADA0073926048AD304115DD8AB6BC9D6909@mail.onetouch.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:02:11AM -0800, Richard Hartman wrote:
> > I don't have a problem with adobe trying to stop software piracy. I do
> > have a problem with them calling on ISPs. that's like coming home to
> > find your car has been taken away without any notice or warning,
> > because, say, you were caught speeding a few days earlier.
> >
>
> Or having the Denver Boot put on because you haven't paid
> your parking tickets? Or having it repossessed because you
> haven't made the payments?
>
> Sorry, but it _does_ make sense to have your service restricted
> if you are in violation.
that's what I was trying to tell with the "without any notice or
warning" part. maybe it would've been clearer had I not said CAUGHT
speeding but, say, "because a neighbor saw you driving with what he
thought was excessive speed the day before".
--
http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub 1024D/D88D35A6 2001-11-14 Tom Vogt <tom@lemuria.org>
Key fingerprint = 276B B7BB E4D8 FCCE DB8F F965 310B 811A D88D 35A6