[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Some opinions on the appellate court's decision (longish)
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Some opinions on the appellate court's decision (longish)
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 08:41:36 -0800
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Moseng [mailto:underwhelm_org@hotmail.com]
...
> Then again, maybe we can just get away with pointing out that
> windows'
> drag-n-drop environment is always one mouse click away from
> doing some a
> priori illegal copying.
So, have they named Bill Gates on a lawsuit yet? Can we
bring him in as a co-defendant on our own initiative?
> By the internet's mere existence, we are presumed infringers.
> Makes you feel
> warm and fuzzy inside.
>
>
Whatever happened to the presumption of innocence?
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!>