[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] The Checks and Ballances are in the mail
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] The Checks and Ballances are in the mail
- From: "Chris Moseng" <underwhelm_org(at)hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:55:19 -0500
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
>From: Jim Bauer <jfbauer@home.com>
>In a criminal case, I would at leat have the right to a free bargain
>basement defence by a public defender who incedently is working
>for the same government that would be prosecuting me. Can you say
>conflict of interest?
>Back to the civil cases. A while back I though of a way
>to pay for the defense of the little guy. If really-big-guy
>sues little-guy, they really-big-guy must provide X% of the money
>they spend on the suit to the defendent for their defense.
How can a person can sincerely believe both of these paragraphs
simultaneously?
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp