[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] ClearChannel Plays It Safe
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] ClearChannel Plays It Safe
- From: Jeme A Brelin <jeme(at)brelin.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 11:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
- In-Reply-To: <E6A0E6DC7BF4D411B3180008C786FAAC05748754@corpmail.usg.com>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Ballowe, Charles wrote:
> It may be an overreaction, but it's hard to see such a change and not
> wonder why they're doing it. Many of the songs on that list advocate
> peace or are anti-war -- I'm not sure why they might ban those.
As I saw it, there were two kinds of songs on that list:
Songs that reference violence or armageddon.
Songs by Rage Against The Machine.
Note that EVERY SINGLE Rage Against The Machine song was on that list.
Recall that Rage Against The Machine are anti-corporate activists and it's
pretty clear that it has nothing to do with violence or probably even the
event on September 11.
J.
--
-----------------
Jeme A Brelin
jeme@brelin.net
-----------------
[cc] counter-copyright
http://www.openlaw.org