[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] "under penalty of perjury"
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] "under penalty of perjury"
- From: Ken Arromdee <arromdee(at)rahul.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:00:15 -0800 (PST)
- In-reply-to: <20030228162712.M50726@tneu.visi.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
If you read the message carefully, the "penalty of perjury" part only applies
to the statement that the BSA is authorized on behalf of the copyright owners
listed in the notice. So not in this case.