[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[dvd-discuss]The Truly Bizarre From Hollywierd

To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Subject: [dvd-discuss]The Truly Bizarre From Hollywierd
From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 11:29:11 -0700
In-reply-to: <1033439288.9838.20.camel@ettin.lumbercartel.com>
References: <3D986EF1.BA76A474@ia.nsc.com>
Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu

This was in the latest EFFector

http://www.eff.org/Cases/Newmark_v_Turner/20021002_joint_stipulation_documents.h
tml 


It makes truly bizarre reading. Anyone who opposes them is a competitor! If I 
were the Judge, I wouldn't even bother letting the Hollywierd Lawyers waste the 
court's time by speaking. Their arguments are ridiculous.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [dvd-discuss]The Truly Bizarre From Hollywierd
  - From: "John Zulauf" <johnzu@ia.nsc.com>

References:
- [dvd-discuss] .002 Online again -- DRM Business Case for Si
  - From: "John Zulauf" <johnzu@ia.nsc.com>
- Re: [dvd-discuss] .002 Online again -- DRM Business Case for Si
  - From: "D. C. Sessions" <dcs@lumbercartel.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [dvd-discuss] Celebs against shorter patent duration
Next by Date: [dvd-discuss] Couple of links:
Previous by thread: Re: [dvd-discuss] .002 Online again -- DRM Business Case for Si
Next by thread: Re: [dvd-discuss]The Truly Bizarre From Hollywierd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread