[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] The 2nd Front
- To: dvd-discuss(at)lweb.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] The 2nd Front
- From: Ken Arromdee <arromdee(at)rahul.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:26:25 -0800 (PST)
- In-reply-to: <XFMail.20011216215248.jfbauer@home.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Jim Bauer wrote:
> 1201(a)(1)(A)
>
> Insert "for the purpose of copyright infringement" after the
> word "measure".
>
> [No person shall circumvent a technological measure for the purpose
> of copyright infringement that effectively controls access to a work
> protected under this title. The prohibition contained in the
> preceding sentence shall take effect at the end of the 2-year
> period beginning on the date of the enactment of this chapter. ]
No good. What's the referent of "... that effectively controls" if it doesn't
appear right after the noun? Maybe just reword the sentence--add "if the
circumvention is being done to infringe copyright" to the end.